Courts and Justice follows employment and labor litigation from docket to decision: NLRB rulings, appeals court arguments, Supreme Court grants and the agency actions that end up tested in court. Outcomes are reported, never predicted.
Labor and employment cases from dockets to decisions, plus the agencies and judges who shape workplace law.
The Supreme Court's 2024 decision overruled Chevron and told judges to exercise independent judgment on statutory meaning; the change lands hardest where agencies like the NLRB and DOL write the rules that govern work.
Twelve regional courts of appeals apply the same federal statutes, and their disagreements over meaning can leave the same conduct lawful in one region and unlawful in another until the Supreme Court intervenes.
The Court does not re-run an NLRB case; it polices the boundary lines of the statute itself, and four landmark rulings from 1937 to 1992 still define where Congress drew them.
Before any employment-discrimination case reaches a federal courtroom, it passes through the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's charge system, which processes tens of thousands of discrimination charges each fiscal year.
Two parallel machines exist for grouping wage claims — the FLSA collective action and the Rule 23 class action — and the choice between them decides how workers join, opt out, and get paid.
A citation is a proposal, not a final penalty, and the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission — not OSHA — holds the last word when an employer fights it.